Blog

  • No More ‘Moon Knight’? Oscar Isaac Has No Further Contract with Marvel Studios

    No More ‘Moon Knight’? Oscar Isaac Has No Further Contract with Marvel Studios

    One thing Marvel Studios fans love to do is speculate on the future of their favorite IP. What’s next for their favorite character? What comic book story will be adapted? In the case of Moon Knight, fans might want to breathe a little bit before they start dreaming about the next big thing.

    Just as fans are introduced to Oscar Isaac’s Steven Grant/Marc Spector/Moon Knight (and some more personalities are certainly on the way), comes word that the star has bucked one of Marvel Studios’ more well-known trends. According to Variety, Isaac does not have a contractual obligation for any further appearances as the Fist of Khonshu.

    According to Isaac, he and the creatives behind the streaming series wanted to keep their focus on the here and now and not get caught up in what might come next. And so, rather than be pinned down for a handful of future appearances, the actor is rolling the dice on the reception of the character:

    I had heard of the golden handcuffs. That was something that I was reticent about. And luckily, we all agreed that this [show] is what we’re going to focus on. This is the story. And if there’s any kind of future, I think it just depends on if people like it, if people want to see more, and if we find a story that’s worth telling.

    Oscar Isaac

    So far, Moon Knight has been received warmly by fans, even if they’re not quite sure what exactly is going on or what to expect over the course of the next 5 episodes. Between that warm reception and the encouraging comments about the future of the character from showrunner Jeremy Slater and Marvel Studios’ brass, it seems incredibly likely that we’ll be seeing more of Isaac and the many different personalities of Moon Knight down the road.

    Source: Variety

  • ‘Obi-Wan Kenobi’ Gets New D+ Premiere Date, 2 Episode Debut

    ‘Obi-Wan Kenobi’ Gets New D+ Premiere Date, 2 Episode Debut

    It was almost two months ago that Lucasfilm announced that the Obi-Wan Kenobi limited series would be premiering on May 25, 2022. This would mean missing out on May 4, Star Wars Day, while still landing the show’s premiere on a relevant Star Wars date, as the original Star Wars feature film premiered on May 25, 1977.

    This has now changed as Obi-Wan himself, Ewan McGregor, announced that the premiere has been delayed a couple of days to the 27th, probably hinting at a weekly Friday release for the Deborah Chow directed series. But perhaps the biggest piece of news is that audiences worldwide will be greeted with a two-episode premiere, something Disney+ has done quite a few times, especially with Marvel Studios releases. While not being a huge shift, it allows Disney to circumvent the situation of having live-action series from two of its biggest franchises releasing on the same day. Marvel Studios’ Ms. Marvel has a June 8 premiere date meaning that had Kenobi kept its Wednesday slot, by its third week Kamala Khan would be joining the Wednesday party and eventually hurting both series’ numbers.

    Obi-Wan Kenobi will mark the return of the aforementioned McGregor to the role, as well as see the return of both Hayden Christensen and Joel Edgerton to roles last played in Revenge of the Sith.

    Source: Twitter

  • ‘Moon Knight’ Might Be Teasing Another of Marc Spector’s Personalities

    ‘Moon Knight’ Might Be Teasing Another of Marc Spector’s Personalities

    With the first episode of Marvel Studios’ Moon Knight in the books, practically everything is still a mystery. We did learn Ethan Hawke’s villain Arthur Harrow appears to be some cult leader figure with connections to the Egyptian deity Ammit, and he wants to create a future where evildoers are eliminated before they commit any bad acts. We also learn that Steven Grant has another personality named Marc Spector living inside of his body who has some connection to Egyptian deity Khonshu and transforms into the titular Moon Knight at the very end of the episode.

    The trailers and marketing for Moon Knight have suggested that Marc Spector and Steven Grant are the only two non-costumed identities in Marc’s mind in the series. Moon Knight comic book fans were the first to point out a major missing piece: Marc Spector’s third primary personality, Jake Lockley.

    Moon Knight

    Traditionally, Marc Spector is the mercenary who is revived by Khonshu before becoming Moon Knight, Steven Grant is a millionaire playboy-type who uses his money to fund Moon Knight’s adventures, and Jake Lockley is rougher Taxi driver who uncovers street-level intel about crime that is afoot. Jake is also sometimes portrayed as the most violent and guiltless personality. Obviously, Moon Knight has already ripped up that script by transforming Steven Grant into a lonely British giftshop employee, so clearly the series is willing to forego classic elements from Moon Knight comics. Still, only one episode in, Moon Knight may already be teasing the third personality for Oscar Isaac to eventually portray.

    First, the episode has a tendency to show a third Isaac in a few places in what looks like very intentional ways. For example, when Steven is in the museum towards the end of the first episode just prior to him encountering the jackal, Steven’s Marc reflection remains in place while he walks away. However, there are two reflections in the mirror. Mirrors are tricky, but other than the imagery of the infinite reflections in the museum bathroom, it’s usually just Marc looking back at Steven. This mirror moment is eerie already, but the added face behind Marc’s is very specifically positioned.

    Marvel Studios Moon Knight

    Another example comes from the end credits. While the credits are not the substance of the series, they often hide plenty of easter eggs. In Isaac’s card, Steven/Marc’s face is broken up into three. Again, there’s certainly something to be said for aesthetics, but interestingly enough, the three faces aren’t totally identical. The middle face is definitely sporting slightly different hair, so there was some intention to make the faces/heads unique.

    Marvel Studios Moon Knight

    Another clue is the appearance of the human statue “Crawley” who the episode credits note is played by Shaun Scott. Bertrand Crawley is a classic Moon Knight character tied specifically to Jake Lockley–he is a homeless man in New York City that befriends Jake and is a key source of information for him. While it could simply be a fun nod to the character, the human statue certainly seems to be a well-placed person in terms of watching what happens around him.

    Marvel Studios Moon Knight

    Obviously, if the series is planning on introducing Jake, it wants to keep that a surprise. It makes sense to grow viewers accumstomed to two personalities first before throwing in a third, especially on top of another supernatural and mythology-heavy mystery. There’s a lot going on. While Moon Knight has not tied itself to any particular comic run or even felt particularly similar to one, it is still a strong guess that the series would not leave out one of the most significant and intrinsic aspects of Marc Spector’s character. Time will tell if the series is slowly unveiling the third idenity.

  • ‘Moon Knight’: The Crawley Cameo Explained

    ‘Moon Knight’: The Crawley Cameo Explained

    The newest installment of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Moon Knight, finally premiered its this week. The series feels determined to keep the viewer in the dark (for now) similar to how the protagonist Steven Grant is taking everything in. The Disney+ show has not given the impression that it intends to take much of its direction from any particular comic book run or even any Moon Knight era. While that makes theorizing where the series is headed much more difficult, the first episode is already leaving major clues and Moon Knight easter eggs to work with. For one, there is a clear nod to classic Moon Knight character Jean-Paul “Frenchie” Duchamp. But Frenchie is not the only long-established comic’s character to be referenced.

    In fact, another major character may have actually already appeared. Actor Shaun Scott is credited with playing “Crawley”, who is the gold-painted human statue Steven Grant seems to be very one-way friendly with. Moon Knight fans will reconize “Crawley” as a reference to Bertrand Crawley, a classic comics character. And he could have major implications for the series and its hero.

    Marvel Studios Moon Knight

    In the comics, Crawley is a homeless man living in New York City, who befriends and becomes an informant for one of Moon Knight’s personalities, Jake Lockley. It is emphasized how close this character is to Moon Knight in comic runs such as the popular Jeff Lemire and Greg Smallwood run, where the character plays a major role in Marc Spector grappling with psychological and supernatural chaos. While that certainly seems on par for Moon Knight, Crawley’s introduction could say a lot more about our protagonist’s past and future.

    Moon Knight

    While the Crawley in the comcis is quite a bit more mobile and talkative than the human statue in Moon Knight, he could be the perfect plant for Moon Knight…or one of his personalities. In a busy area of London, Crawley can blend right by looking like a tourist magnet or street performer. By staying quiet and still, he would not bring much attention to himself and might simply have unfettered ability to observe things happening nearby and act as a fly on the wall without suspicion. But why would Moon Knight be interested in that?

    Crawley is generally the definition of a street-level character. While Moon Knight is currently set abroad, the titular hero spends most of his time in the comics as a caped vigilante in New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles. We have little to go off now with respect to Marc Spector and Moon Knight’s history within the MCU, but everything points to a larger-than-life supernatural conflict against Ethan Hawke’s Arthur Harrow. If Crawley is someone in Moon Knight’s life, though, that would suggest that the hero may have spent a significant amount of time as a crime-fighting vigilante in London. That could connect the hero to other classic characters and villains like Midnight Man, who is meant to appear in Moon Knight. In other words, the classic comic book portrayal of the character might still be in play.

    It also raises interesting questions about the relationship between Moon Knight’s separate identities. In the comics, Crawley is very much connected to the Jake Lockley personality, who has yet to appear or be advertised. While Crawley could certainly tease Jake’s future introduction, there’s also something to be said about Steven’s own interactions with the human statute. Steven seems very drawn to him, which emphasized how lonely and awkward the character seems to be. But if another personality knows Crawley and works with him, maybe Steven subconsciously gravitates towards him. That would be another indication that Marc Spector, Jake Lockley, or Moon Knight are already using him as an informant by the time we meet Steven in the first episode.

    There is always the possibility that Crawley the human statue is meant to be no more than an Easter egg and an acknowledgement of the character. But while the Frenchie reference was merely a name in a cell phone, Crawley is an actual flesh-and-bone character that has physically appeared in Moon Knight and has passively interacted with Steven Grant. While that could mean that Crawley is an already-existing and significant part of the MCU’s Moon Knight’s activities, it could also be a setup for the future. If Moon Knight does mostly explore an Egyptian mythology storyline, Moon Knight and his personalities could very well find themselves at a somewhat fresh start at the end of a wild and weird psychologically-dense series. Perhaps he leaves some of his obedience and dedication to Khonshu behind him–as he does several times throughout his comic book history–but still decides to use his skills and background for fighting crime in London. If he needs help, he already knows a guy.

  • ‘McClane’: Looking Back On the Unmade Bruce Willis Send-Off

    ‘McClane’: Looking Back On the Unmade Bruce Willis Send-Off

    Bruce Willis is stepping away from acting and, in doing so, leaving a genre-defining career behind him. A recent statement from his family revealed the actor is suffering from aphasia, a cognitive disorder that affects a person’s ability to communicate properly with others. As a result, the icon will end his decades-long stint of performing and begin a new phase of his life. This is sad for a multitude of reasons, not the least of which is the way it will undoubtedly complicate things for himself and his loved ones. However, for the rest of us, we’ll be losing out on the possibility of a late-stage Willis renaissance, in the same vein as Robert Forster or the more-popular-than-ever Michael Keaton. Instead, the actor’s acclaimed time in the spotlight will have petered out with a long string of low-budget, direct-to-video features.

    Despite having a sometimes tumultuous public image, Willis’ impact on Hollywood and American culture cannot be understated. Although he started as the face of a hit rom-com series, an impressive string of roles in films like Pulp Fiction12 MonkeysThe Fifth Element, and Armageddon established him as the epitome of “cool guy action star” mixed with a bit of “grumpy old dad.” A niche market to corner in the global eye, for sure, but one no celebrity may ever hold the same way again. Of course, none of this would have been possible for the actor if it weren’t for the late-80s phenomenon that was Die Hard. Still regarded as one of the greatest action pictures of all time, the movie’s success flung Willis into stardom and exemplified what every film of the genre would try to achieve after it. The initial flick spawned four sequels, made over twenty-five years and ranging in quality from a worthy follow-up to “why did they make this?”

    As his career began to wane, it often felt like Willis was reaching back to his glory days in hollow imitation pieces. While Red was admittedly enjoyable, it failed to live up to the height of it’s star’s highest peaks, and 2013’s A Good Day to Die Hard ran through a series of predetermined motions without any of the edge that made the franchise so great. The series’ protagonist, John McClane, never even said his famous R-rated catchphrase, which was instead replaced by the more tongue-in-cheek “yippee-ki-yay, Mother Russia”. Once it became clear that Willis may be in the final stretch of his profession, a push was seemingly made to capitalize on the actor’s increasingly reclusive nature. M. Night Shyamalan brought Willis’ famous David Dunn character back for a send-off in 2019’s Glass, and Edward Norton gave him his last big-budget appearance with a supporting role in the noir drama Motherless Brooklyn, a sub-genre Willis had enjoyed dabbling in.

    Yet, as recently as a couple of years ago, there was still an idea in the air to bring the personality’s biggest role out of retirement for one last go-around. Following the dismal premiere of A Good Day, Fox Studios was trying to find a way to revive the once-adored franchise with some sort of unique twist. There was an idea for a crossover film with Kiefer Sutherland‘s televised 24 series, tentatively titled Die Hard 24/7, that never materialized after certain contract negotiations stalled and the plot was retooled as a simple 24 sequel series instead. Inspired by this, there was then a plan to continue the Die Hard legacy with a 12-episode prequel mini-series called Die Hard: Year One, based on the graphic novel of the same name and starring a new actor as a young John McClane with Bruce Willis narrating events as his future self. However, Willis despised the script and refused to contribute to or endorse its creation. As such, the project fell through and the franchise reset once more.

    This brings things to 2018, when producer and writer Lorenzo di Bonaventura handed in a treatment for a sixth, and potentially final, Die Hard film simply titled McClane. The concept was similar to Year One, with a story that would venture away from the usual tropes of Die Hard to focus on the actual life of John McClane and reveal the origins of the character. Bonaventura described the movie as being a lot like The Godfather Part II, bouncing back and forth between McClane in both his sixties and twenties, with Willis returning as the older version of the one-time beat cop. Intentions were good, with the creative team aiming for a more thoughtful character study that would invest fans in McClane “more than ever before.” Unfortunately, despite support from big names like producer Tobey Maguire and probable returning actress Mary Elizabeth-Winstead, scheduling issues with Willis, who had recently committed to making his string of direct-to-video appearances, started to make it look like the film may never enter production.

    Now, it’s becoming more clear that the scheduling issues were in large part due to the actor’s declining health. It’s been rumored that Willis focused on taking easier work when his symptoms began, so that he could continue acting without the demands of a high-profile film. While this has not been confirmed, the timeline does add up, and it would make sense if Fox was hesitant to invest big money into a movie they weren’t sure Willis could finish. Ultimately, the acquisition of Fox by Disney in 2019 resulted in any plans for McClane being scrapped, with more unconfirmable rumors abound that the mega studio would eventually just reboot the series under their own power. At the very least, we now know that Bruce Willis will not be involved if Die Hard ever reemerges.

    In many respects, it sounds like the McClane would have been the aging actor’s grand finale, literally and metaphorically ending his time in the spotlight and passing the torch to a new generation of action stars. A genre-bending franchise departure to blend his best acting roles with his most iconic fictional character, giving up the role with the grace of Hugh Jackman‘s Logan. Perhaps it’s overly wistful to assume the movie would have been at all worth watching. It’s just more heartening to pretend McClane is a lost masterpiece than it is to accept that Willis, and his character by extension, went out with barely an explosion.

    Source: Variety, MTV, Deadline, CBR, Entertainment Weekly, Fandango, Bloomberg

  • Giacomo Gianniotti Recorded New Lines for ‘Marvel’s Avengers’ Hawkeye

    Giacomo Gianniotti Recorded New Lines for ‘Marvel’s Avengers’ Hawkeye

    We’ve been quite patient for the 2022 roadmap from Marvel’s Avengers, but there’s still no word when we might expect it. While the latest patch has faced some issues for PlayStation 5 users, it still added some additional elements to help newer players finding their way through the game’s multiplayer options. Still, everyone is hoping to see some more story content featuring our favorite Avengers and it seems something might be brewing.

    Giacomo Gianniotti took to his Instagram stories to share that he is currently working on something involving the game. @PlayAvenger was the first to notice the post which hints that they are working on some kind of story content that might find its way to palyers at some point this year.

    https://twitter.com/PlayAvenger/status/1509276660759203840

    We’ll see if the roadmap announcement isn’t too far off, but it’s great to know that the team continues to put in the work to grow the game. The current additions indicate that they probably are still seeing an ongoing influx of new players which made the necessity to ease them into the process make sense. Plus, preparing everything ahead of the major reveal of roadmap is probably them seeing the potential. For now, let’s hope the reveal isn’t too far away.

    Source: Instagram via Twitter

  • ‘Ironheart’ To Feature the MCU’s First Transgender Woman

    ‘Ironheart’ To Feature the MCU’s First Transgender Woman

    Marvel Studios Ironheart is set to go into production in just a few weeks and as the cast begins to fill out, a new report indicates that the streaming series will include a groundbreaking MCU character. According to a new report from POC Culture, Ironheart will introduce the MCU’s first transgender woman.

    The report details a casting call for a Black, Latina or Afro-Latina transgender woman, 18-22, who is “unapologetically nerdy” with a “mystical bent” and a “unique sense of humor.” Ironheart will star Dominique Thorne as Riri Williams, a genius and inventor whose technology plays a key role in the conflict between Wakanda and Tlalocon. The series will also star Anthony Ramos in an unknown role and an unknown actor/actress as the child of Iron Man villain Obadiah Stane (the studio was open to a female for the role as well).

    Updating…

    Source: POC Culture

  • Michael Giacchino’s ‘Werewolf by Night’ Disney+ Halloween Special Started Production

    Michael Giacchino’s ‘Werewolf by Night’ Disney+ Halloween Special Started Production

    While still not officially confirmed by Marvel Studios, the long-rumored Werewolf by Night Disney+ special has started production in Georgia. The official website has revealed that a Disney+ project with the working title “Buzzcut” was currently in production, which was revealed back in August to belong to the Disney+ Halloween Special. Technically, it still has no title only that Michael Giacchino will direct the special with Gael Garcia Bernal in the title role.

    The production start matches that was first reported last month, as it was originally going to start mid-March before getting pushed back by a few weeks. Looks like they still managed to keep it within the timing window to ensure it’ll be able to release by Halloween of this year. It’ll be the second Special for the MCU, as they also have a Christmas Special on the horizon for Guardians of the Galaxy.

    It’ll be interesting to see how they tackle a special, especially if it introduces a completely new character into the MCU. They seem to be building up a Midnight Suns team with each new darker addition. Here’s hoping we get an official name soon, as the project is already entering production and we have no idea what it’s going to be called or even an official word from Marvel Studios.

    Source: Georgia

  • ‘Avengers: Infinity War’ and ‘Avengers: Endgame’s Production Budget Was $1 Billion

    ‘Avengers: Infinity War’ and ‘Avengers: Endgame’s Production Budget Was $1 Billion

    Marvel Studios was all-in with their double featured led by the Joe and Anthony Russo, who were fresh off of their success with Captain America: Civil War. At the time, there were rumblings that the films were working with a budget of around $400 million but it was never truly confirmed. Well, that was until now, as Joe Russo revealed during a panel at Sands International Film Festival of St. Andrews that Avengers: Infinity War and its sequel Endgame each cost $500M to make. As such, they had a total budget of a billion making it probably the most expensive productions in Hollywood.

    I don’t know if these numbers have ever been accurately reported but in the case of Avengers: Endgame or Infinity War, each of those movies was $500 million plus. So this is an incredible amount of money that is being spent on these films. And you have responsibility, if you have a conscience to in some way deliver a return on that investment for the people that gave you that money. So it is risky to say ‘Hey we got a crazy idea, here’s how we can subvert expectations but we’re going to take your two most popular characters and we’re going to have them try to kill each other.’

    Joe Russo

    It definitely paid off, as not only did Endgame become the highest grossing film for some time before a re-release of Avatar took back the top spot, but we can only imagine how much money they made on home releases, merchandising and more. You have to also respect the fact that the company was willing to risk it. They believed in two directors that had their humble TV roots that would end up developing some iconic entries in one of the largest franchises of the world.

    Source: Deadline via ScreenCrush

  • ‘Yellowjackets’ Ella Purnell Cast as Lead in Amazon’s ‘Fallout’

    ‘Yellowjackets’ Ella Purnell Cast as Lead in Amazon’s ‘Fallout’

    Fallout could be considered to be among one of the most popular game franchises of all time, set in the futuristic, post-apocalyptic world that never let go of the ’50s. Each game in the series has featured a different protagonist, usually survivors frozen within vaults who wake to find a whole new world before them. It seems Amazon may have found their sole survivor in Ella Purnell, who’s been cast as the lead in the streamer’s adaption.

    Deadline is reporting that the star of Yellowjackets and Army of The Dead, Ella Purnell, has been cast as the lead character in their series adaption of the popular game franchise. While details of her character have yet to be confirmed, it’s believed that she will be playing the role of Jean. She is descried as a young woman with a can-do attitude who might just be keeping a dangerous secret. Plot details on the series also remain under wraps but the project added Walton Goggins to its cast just a few weeks ago, playing the role of a currently unnamed Ghoul.

    The project is in development at Amazon films alongside Kilter Films, working in association with Bethesda Game Studios and Bethesda Softworks. Todd Howard is involved with the project via Bethesda Game Studios with James Altman producing via Bethesda Softworks. Geneva Robertson-Dworet and Graham Wagner will serve as showrunners on the series which is currently set to begin filming sometime this year, although there is currently no specific time frame listed.

    Source: Deadline