DC Cinematic Universe’s future remains a big question mark. Co-CEO James Gunn has hinted that we’ll see our first look at the franchise’s future in January but anything can happen by then. Thinking back, so much has already changed and shifted with Wonder Woman 3 dead in the water and Henry Cavill no longer returning as Superman; just as he was about to return due to Dwayne Johnson‘s insistence that Black Adam is Superman’s biggest rival. Still, it made many assume that future projects would end up seeing their main stars recast outside of some Gunn mainstays from The Suicide Squad.
Well, Gunn is no stranger to outright speaking his mind and confirming that not everything is as the Internet wills it into existence. According to one of his latest tweets reacting to a few statements regarding the Snyderverse fandom, he reveals that he’s not going to just recast every actor that’s been a part of the DCEU so far.
I keep seeing posts with this untrue theory. We're not recasting everyone except The Suicide Squad.
The big question, however, is if the DCEU will remain the way it was or if they simply rebooting the entire thing with The Flash. A multiverse storyline is the perfect outlet to give the franchise another chance even if it’ll likely muddle up some people’s expectations of these stories. It would be ironic if some similar plans were set for Marvel Studios’ The Multiverse Saga but due to its urgency, DC got the chance to reboot their franchise first.
The Last of Us is almost upon us and luckily, it means we’ll finally get to see Pedro Pascal‘s take on the iconic character of Joel. Though, as often is the case, you never know who else might’ve almost had the role to define their take on a popular character. As it turns out, TheBoys and Supernatural alum Jensen Ackles was campaigning quite a bit to take on the role of Joel Miller but seemingly never truly got into the running.
I was really pushing hard, but I don’t think I was really in the mix or even had a shot at Pedro Pascal’s role in the Last Of Us. but that was high up on my radar.
Jensen Ackles
Ackles is a big name but he got a second boost when he finished his work with The Boys‘ latest season. Plus, who knows if he was what they were looking for at the time, as Joel is more an older character that represents the hardship of when time passes by them and they somewhere gave up. Ackles has a lot of energy and likely might’ve not fallen into what they were looking for.
The first trailers were quite promising with the adaptation of the classic Naughty Dog gaming franchise. It would be hard to imagine Ackles in the role, but it’s a shame he didn’t get a chance to tackle a different role in the series. Perhaps they are mapping out multiple seasons and are interested in adding him after all.
DC Studios will shape the future of an entire franchise with James Gunn and producer Peter Safran at the steering wheel. It’s an exciting prospect to see what the future has in store for the franchise, even as they leave behind some of the landmarks that defined the franchise throughout the last few years. Yet, it seems that they almost weren’t in the leading position as Warner Bros. Discovery had their eyes set on someone else.
As it turns out, their big hope was for Todd Phillips, the director behind the surprise billion dollar box office hit, Joker, and The Hangover trilogy. An insider shared just how far they went in trying to get him involved with the project, after “the whole town turned the job down. It was almost Todd Phillips. They begged him.”
Everyone was aware of the impossible task set upon them taking over a role that Kevin Feige managed to master against all odds. Gunn was a fitting choice considering he’s worked under Marvel Studios’ leadership to get a glimpse at what it means to run a cinematic franchise. Still, there does seem to be some concern, especially with him not having been in such a position before.
I wonder if big filmmakers will work for another director with zero experience guiding movies through a huge grinder of a system. He’s not Kevin Feige [of Marvel].
Though it should be noted that the same issue also would’ve been with Phillips if he was given the position. He only has the additional caveat of having no real interest in the DC universe or any understanding of what makes it tick. Yes, Joker was a success but that doesn’t mean every film he touches would have the same effect. Plus, he has openly mocked the genre in the past and who knows how the DC Cinematic Universe would look like under his leadership.
Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse is one of the most anticipated movies of 2023, and the views on the new trailer surely prove it. The first trailer for 2018’s Into The Spider-Verse gained just around 16M views in 5 years, while the trailer for its sequel amassed nearly 30M views in less than a week.
While Sony is planning on expanding its slate of live-action films with yet another villain-focused ‘Spider-Man’ movie, its animated section continues to grow the Spider-Verse franchise. The synopsis and first look at the movie look promising, and with all the delays so that the crew would have “more time to make it great”, we know the cape flick won’t disappoint.
As a part of their 2023 summer preview, Entertainment Weekly released a new still from Sony Pictures Animation’s Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse. Included with the still were more details on the film’s plot, along with an interview with the film’s producers, PhilLord and Christopher Miller.
Miles Morales as Spider-Man (Shameik Moore) in Columbia Pictures and Sony Pictures Animation’s SPIDER-MAN: ACROSS THE SPIDER-VERSE.
According to Miller, a key part of the film’s set-up is having the franchise lead Miles Morales go through all the usual struggles of a teen while also dealing with his additional responsibilities as a hero.
As he’s growing up, he’s trying to figure out how he can go out and see the world and spread his wings and leave the nest. But he also feels rooted to his home and his family. It’s that push-pull of your life as a teenager, where you’re like, How do I get to be my own person, but also not lose where I came from?
Christopher Miller
One of those teenage things on Miles’s plate will be a developing relationship with Gwen Stacey, who he met in the first film. Gwen is also the key to an increased load of those new hero things as well, introducing Miles to a whole slew of characters, including Spider-Woman. EW further revealed that Spider-Woman will be Gwen’s mentor in the film, and will be voiced by Insecure’s Issa Rae. Lord affirms that “a lot of work has gone into making that character look great,” and adds “If you’ve ever been around Issa, she’s such a dynamo of talent and grace, so you just want to make the character look as cool as she is.”
Spider-Woman isn’t the only spider-person Miles is set to meet in the new film. Chris Miller has confirmed yet again that Oscar Isaac‘s Miguel O’Hara, who appeared in a post-credit scene in the original film and seems to butt heads with Miles in the trailer, will not be the villain of the movie, but just “sort of an antagonist to Miles because they both think that what they’re doing is the right thing”. Rather, as already confirmed by the film’s synopsis, The Spot will be the movie’s main villain. Here’s what Phil Lord had to say about him:
I like the villains best when they reflect the journeys of the hero — sort of a dark mirror of the protagonist, and I think Spot’s no different. He wants to be seen as legitimate. He’s a character that has a silly costume and is not always seen as the top tier of Spider-Man foes, but like all of us, he wants to be taken seriously.
Phil Lord
With The Spot on board as the villain for both this film and the sequel, he’ll certainly have his chance to make an impact on Spider-Man.
Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse releases in theaters on June 2, 2023.
The first two seasons of Amazon Studios’ Jack Ryan have been fun, binge-worthy entertainment that have, at times, felt more inspired by the Bourne novels than Tom Clancy‘s expansive Ryanverse. John Krasinski‘s CIA analyst has been called on him to be equal parts spymaster and tough guy as he was thrown into the thick of some fascinatingly complex scenarios. However, despite Clancy having published 17 Ryanverse novels, neither of the previous two seasons’ plots felt predicated on anything Clancy-esque. Familiar characters, sure; high-stakes political intrigue, check. But Seasons 1 and 2 seemed simply to be missing just a pinch of something. Season 3 seems to have found it by adding one key ingredient that helped launch Clancy’s incredibly successful career in the mid-1980s: the Russians.
*NOTE: This review contains light spoilers for Episodes 1-4*
While lie the previous two seasons it’s not an adaptation of any particular Clancy novel, Season 3, which feels almost uncomfortably familiar in light of current events, immediately feels like a Clancy novel come to life. Maybe a little The Cardinal of the Kremlin; maybe a little Red Rabbit; maybe it’s neither or both. Whatever the case, Season 3’s premise is built around a Russia willing to go to extremes to destabilize the region by any means necessary in order to restore the country to its former glory. The flashback used to open Episode 1, “Falcon”, establishes some key players and the central element of the season’s ongoing plot: a secret project called Sokol. In present day, many of those key players have become major movers and shakers in a part of the world that’s been greatly changed over the years, setting up arguably the series’ best work to date with the intricacies of spymasters, double agents and betrayal.
And make no mistake, betrayal is the key theme of the first four episodes of Season 3. Who is betraying whom, who knows they are being betrayed and who doesn’t, and the ramifications of all the betrayals takes the better part of the first four episodes to start to crystalize but it makes for an intriguing enough premise. Of course, fans of the series already know that it’s more than just spygames: it’s also about big action. In that regard, the first half of Season 3 doesn’t disappoint. All the action beats you’ve come to expect from Jack Ryan are clear and present and the franchise hasn’t jumped the shark yet in terms of pushing the boundaries of reality.
Over the course of the first two seasons of Jack Ryan, how you feel about John Krasinski‘s performance as the titular hero essentially determines your perception of the show. Whether by design or unfortunate accident, outside of Ali Suliman‘s Mousa bin Suleiman and Wendell Pierce’s grumpy James Greer, the supporting cast of characters aren’t especially memorable. Season 3 does little to change that, keeping it all Krasinski all the time. Especially wooden and boring depictions of the Eastern European characters make them easily forgettable members of a conspiracy that could otherwise cause far more suspense as the series turns the corner into the second half.
The first half of Season 3 does shuffle the deck enough to keep fans of the franchise interested. The events of Episode 1 put Ryan in a situation that feels both familiar to the events of Season 2, but different enough that it allows for an impressive display of his resourcefulness. It’s here that creators Carlton Cuse and Graham Roland lean back into Bourne territory as they begin to establish Ryan as someone with the beginnings of a global reach. In that way, the scope of the franchise is beginning to expand in a way that will allow the fourth and final season of the series to tell a fittingly massive story while also setting up potential spinoffs that build out the universe.
If you’re searching for a big action spy-thriller that makes you feel like the Cold War is back on, the first half of Season 3 of Jack Ryan will hit the spot. The first four episodes serve mainly as table setters for the big back half and while it’s a bit familiar, there’s just enough newness sprinkled in to make it worth a few hours of your time this holiday weekend.
After leading man Jared Keeso took some time to focus on the Letterkenny spinoff, Shoresy, he has returned for Season 11 of Letterkenny and… it’s a mixed bag. Letterkenny has always been one of those shows that wasn’t designed for everyone. The humor can be crude. The characters can be hard to relate to. And the show can often feel like there’s no real point to it. In the end, though, Letterkenny always delights, even with its faults. Unfortunately, though, Season 11 takes a bit longer to get going and the episodes themselves never really feel cohesive.
Letterkenny is a weird show. There’s no denying as much. It’s a weird show that is packed full of humor and proves Keeso, who helped to create both Letterkenny and Shoresy, is incredibly talented. However, following the excellent first season of Shoresy, it’s hard to return to Letterkenny as it is. Keeso as Shoresy is just excellent, and there’s something special about that character and his journey not to be such an asshole. Letterkenny, which does briefly bring back Shoresy this season, feels like much of the same. The ladies remain wonderful – especially Katie and Gail – and the Skids remain the best part of the series. But while those characters continue to grow – yes, even Stewart – it never really feels like Wayne and the others do.
That isn’t to say Letterkenny is bad. It’s not. It’s still great, but Season 11 takes a bit to get going. The “Chips” episode feels pointless and is ultimately a weird choice to kick off the season. Had it been done as a special episode? That would’ve been great, but again, as a season opener, it feels like a poor decision. There’s no real value to be gained from the episode. Is it funny? Yes. Does it serve a purpose? Absolutely not. Thankfully, by episode three, the show regains its footing for the season and begins to build out a story across the remainder of the episodes. Said story focuses on the always crude Gail, played wonderfully by Lisa Codrington, and her questionable choices. One of Letterkenny‘s biggest strengths is that it always its female characters to be realistic and that includes allowing them to be sexual beings. Gail makes some poor decisions this season, that allows the rest of the characters to explore actual issues faced by women daily, and still finds a way to make it an important topic while keeping things light-handed. It’s one thing that Letterkenny does better than most shows these days. It isn’t afraid to let its female characters exist. Flaws and all.
Once the season finds a real starting point, it’s smooth sailing from that point forward. The show brings back the always fantastic Glen, who is as ridiculous as ever, to work with Clark Backo‘s Rosie on finding a missing dog. The hilarity that ensues from that point on, courtesy of the Dicks, is a great reminder of what makes Letterkenny so great. But then the show takes a minor stumble yet again in the final episode of the season. As always, Wayne and company continue to have each other’s backs, which is great. However, there are only so many times a season can end with a big fight that is only briefly shown before it cuts to the end credits.
And yet, with an uneven start and a finish that literally feels like an ending used before, Letterkenny‘s eleventh season isn’t as strong as those before it. However, with a strong first (?) season of Shoresy, one has to imagine Keeso and company still have plenty more in stock for the Letterkenny crew and can easily deliver a hell of a twelfth season. Because there’s no way a Season 12 isn’t on the horizon.
After thirteen dormant years, James Cameron‘s epic story has at long last been continued as Avatar: The Way of Water has finally hit theaters. After releasing as the biggest film of all time in 2009, Avatar looked ripe to become the next major Hollywood franchise. However, to the surprise of nearly everyone, director Cameron famously pumped the brakes on the future of his hot new intellectual property to allow for technology to catch up to his grand plans. He didn’t spend the next decade just twiddling his thumbs, though. On top of eventually making The Way of Water, the iconic creative also filmed a second sequel, and outlined a full-blown saga lasting at least five total movies, with the potential for more should the audience demand be there.
While plot details for the remaining films past The Way of Water are sparse, there may be an unexpected source that teases what Cameron has in store. All the way back in 2018, the BBC reported a list of leaked titles they claimed were for the planned Avatar sequels:
Avatar: The Way of Water
Avatar: The Seed Bearer
Avatar: The Tulkun Rider
Avatar: The Quest for Eywa
At the time, fans took the names with an appropriate grain of salt, but it’s easy to see now why that’s no longer the case. The BBC is now 25% correct, which has caused many people to assume the rest of the Avatar title line-up is going to follow suit. In an effort to maintain mystique, executive producer Jon Landau recently stated he and Cameron had already decided on what the sequels will be called, and that online users shouldn’t go by the previously rumored movie names. It’s very possible that the creatives ultimately decided to change the rest of the titles at some point in the development process, but the specificity of the BBC nailing The Way of Water, a fairly non-generic moniker, and referencing a creature from the sequel, the whale-like Tulkun, so many years before it’s release would suggest the other labels were at least correct at some point.
As such, the names may actually lend themselves well to an attempt at deciphering the events set to take place in the next three Avatar projects. Admittedly, combining the remaining titles with the plotlines established in the first two films still only paints a fairly vague picture, but theorizing is almost always fun and it can’t hurt to try. So, Murphy’s Multiverse is going to throw some thoughts at the wall and hope they stick.
Avatar: The Seed Bearer
Weirdly enough, the direct sequel to The Way of Water may be the most difficult to figure out. Unlike the other titles on this list, The Seed Bearer does not reference any specific concept or idea already set in place by the initial films. Luckily, The Way of Water does lay out a few obvious threads for the next movie to pick up on, so one can assume Cameron expands upon those and goes from there.
The end of the second film features Jack Champion‘s human Na’vi appreciator “Spider” rescuing the villainous Recombinant clone of his father, Stephan Lang‘s Colonel Miles Quaritch, from drowning. Given his twisted nature has yet to falter, and the fact he’s confirmed to return in the next sequel, it’s insanely likely that Col. Quaritch once again plays an antagonistic role in Avatar 3. Cameron revealed in 2017 that Lang would act as the baddie of all five written Avatar movies, so don’t expect him to die off in The Seed Bearer either.
It also stands to reason that the children of Sam Worthington‘s Jake Sully and Zoe Saldana‘s Neytiri will continue to play massive roles in the franchise. Each surviving youth seems to possess some sort of important character trait within the world of Pandora. Britain Dalton‘s strong-willed Lo’ak has a natural ability to understand the downtrodden, and is primed to take a leading role following the tragic death of his older brother, while Sigourney Weaver‘s Kiri has a strong, visceral connection to Eywa and the heart of all living things – something Sully is warned could kill her in the middle of The Way of Water before being all but dropped as plot device in the finale. It seems reasonable to say these characters and their development will be a big focus of The Seed Bearer and everything that comes after it.
As for the title and overall plot, it’s still but a loose guess. The Way of Water saw Jake and Neytiri accept the sea-faring Metkayina as their people and new home, but that doesn’t mean the tree-dwelling Omaticaya are never to appear again. The beginning of Avatar 2 revealed much of the Omaticaya’s homeland was destroyed by the return of humans to Pandora, positioning the once-comfortable Na’vi in a fortified, cavernous mountain home as they stay prepared for assaults by their mortal enemies. When the Sully family departed their tribe, Neytiri was notably against leaving her home behind, and only did so out of concern for the safety of her kids. Perhaps The Seed Bearer has Neytiri growing uncomfortable with the Metkayina and her act of abandonment, eventually convincing her husband to travel back into the forest with a plan to save the Omaticaya, defeat the humans, and regrow the Hometree that fell during the events of the first film.
Col. Quaritch would undoubtedly see this as another opportunity to bring down Jake Sully and claim Pandora for Earth, and it’s plausible he uses his undeniable charm to weasel his way back to the front of Earth’s brutal army. The identity of the titular Seed Bearer is hard to pin down, but it could end up being Kiri, whose connection to Eywa and the Tree of Souls might be the key to restoring Pandora to it’s former glory. Especially if she manages to gain access to her unconscious (or deceased) mother’s scientific knowledge of Pandora’s inner workings.
Avatar: The Tulkun Rider
It’s incredibly easy to figure out who this title is referring to. The Way of Water has a major subplot involving the Tulkun, the aforementioned whale-like creatures who form spirit bonds with the Na’vi of the Omaticaya. Specifically, it tells a riveting tale about Lo’ak and his growth into a young warrior, which occurs by way of his bonding with Pandora’s most feared Tulkun – an outcast called Payakan. Following the third act of the second Avatar entry, Lo’ak all but gains the honorary mantle of “Tulkun Rider”, and with his leading franchise role being taken into consideration, there’s a good chance he’s The Tulkun Rider in question.
Yet, this doesn’t explain why the fourth Avatar might be named after him. Fortunately, a little digging gives further hints. In a 2021 conversation with Denis Villeneuve for Variety, Cameron stated that he was forced to film nearly a third of The Tulkun Rider at the same time as The Way of Water and Avatar 3, because he needed the children to stay the same age until a certain point in the movie. He elaborated at the time:
I had to shoot the kids out. They’re allowed to age six years in the middle of the story on page 25 of movie ‘4.’ So I needed everything before then, and then everything after, we’ll do later.
James Cameron
This means that, partway through The Tulkun Rider, there will be a sizable time-jump of around six years. Lo’ak, already a young man in The Way of Water, will probably be allowed to grow into adulthood and find himself after the timeline skip. With the nature of storytelling in mind, there’s a very solid chance The Tulkun Rider revolves around Lo’ak’s ascent to a leadership position within the Na’vi people, and a succession of his father as their most legendary warrior. Potentially, if the third film does go back to the forests of Pandora, he will also be shown as a great unifying force between all of the Na’vi tribes. How the other characters factor into this concept is too difficult to tell, but a betting man would be smart to theorize Lo’ak as the essential lead of Avatar 4.
Avatar: The Quest for Eywa
Another somewhat difficult title to break down, but not entirely impossible. Based on the first two films, viewers know that “Eywa” – also known as the “Great Mother” – is the lifeforce that binds all of Pandora together. She is essentially the Na’vi’s greatest deity, and the power they hold most sacred. Though, if Eywa is something that exists in every living thing around Pandora, how could there possibly be a search for her? If taken at face value, this title sounds as if Lucasfilm titled the next Star Wars project something along the lines of Star Wars: The Search for The Force. A little goofy. Unless, of course, it isn’t.
As mentioned in the theorized plot for Avatar: The Seed Bearer, Sigourney Weaver‘s Kiri has an unusual connection to Eywa and the planet of Pandora at large. She can communicate and direct both flora and fauna at her will, feels the pulse of Eywa at any given moment, and occasionally experiences intense, seizure-inducing visions when bonded with the ecosystem. Her birth is also a bit of a mystery, having occurred after the death of her genetic mother, from an Avatar body, with no known father or signs of pregnancy beforehand. Almost, one might say, a bit Christ-like. When Weaver‘s previous Avatar character, Dr. Grace Augustine, passed, she was connected to both her Avatar and the Tree of Souls. This is quite the pitch, but maybe, somehow, Eywa used this scenario to produce a child that could act as it’s physical embodiment on Pandora.
In theory, Kiri could actually be Eywa. If this is true, then Avatar: The Quest for Eywa may be about the hunt for a missing Kiri, who has been realized as the true savior of her people and an essential part of Pandora’s future. What remains to be asked is this – if Kiri is gone, where did she go? Allow producer Jon Landau to give further insight:
I wasn’t going to talk about it, but I’ve now subsequently heard that Jim has talked about it a little bit. In [‘Avatar 5’] there is a section of the story where we go to Earth. And we go to it to open people’s eyes, open Neytiri’s eyes, to what exists on Earth. Earth is not just represented by the RDA [the franchise’s evil organization known as the Resources Development Administration]. Just like you’re defined by the choices you make in life, not all humans are bad. Not all Na’vi are good. And that’s the case here on Earth. And we want to expose Neytiri to that.
Jon Landau
This quote, taken from a recent Variety interview, might be hiding a lot more than people think. Jake Sully, or any other Avatar character for that matter, doesn’t seem like the type of person to rationally take his native Na’vi wife to Earth as a way of sending a message. It seems as though Neytiri would end up on Earth for a different reason altogether, with Cameron using the experience as a way of progressing her development arc. Neytiri is fierce, and The Way of Watershowed she’d do anything to protect her family. Next theory? Avatar: The Quest for Eywa sees Col. Quaritch and the RDA also coming to understand Kiri’s importance, and abducting her to weaken Pandora and advance their studies on Earth. Neytiri, among others, would then go to Earth to retrieve her daughter and restore Eywa to her homeworld.
Along the way, Neytiri gains an appreciation for the common people of Earth, and her attitude toward the next step in Pandora’s relationship with humans begins to differ. This idea is, like the rest of the thoughts laid out here, not set in stone, but it is the best that Murphy’s Multiverse can come up with based on current information. Only an immense amount of time and money will actually pull back the curtain on the puzzle that is Avatar‘s future, and fans of the franchise are sure to be eagerly awaiting when it happens.
Weeks after ascending to the top of DC Studios, James Gunn made a major statement about the future of the DC Universe when he announced that he was writing a treatment for an all-new Superman film. Gunn’s project, which he may ultimately direct, has no ties to Henry Cavill‘s Man of Steel or the Snyderverse and should be a signal to fans about the direction of the newly minted studio. Superman is a priority for DC Studios and by taking it on himself to write the script, Gunn is making sure his vision is the one that defines the character.
Telling a good Superman story isn’t easy in the 2020s which means Gunn’s taking a lot of responsibility in his new role as co-chair. If fans don’t respond well to the new project, Gunn will take the heat. That’s a long way off, however, as the script is obviously just being developed now but that doesn’t mean that Gunn hasn’t had Superman on his mind for quite some time. In fact, he’s been very vocal about his love for and interest in the character over the last several years and has come close to either developing a Superman or Superman-adjacent property more than once! Here’s a look, albeit a brief one, at Gunn’s love of Superman.
For Gunn, it likely all started in 1978 when, as a 12-year-old, he saw Richard Donner‘s Superman at a theater in Des Peres, Missourri. Gunn called Superman a “great movie” that “rivaled Star Wars” for him and, in a 2021 interview, credited it with getting him “really excited about the genre.”
Before becoming the driving creative force behind Marvel Studios Guardians of the Galaxy, Gunn wrote and directed 2010’s Super, a black comedy about a hero with no super powers which may or may not be a part of a cinematic universe where the “evil Superman” character from Brightburn exists, but even while he was tied up at Marvel, he remained a fan of Superman. In a long Twitter thread from 2016, Gunn made it clear that he enjoyed 2013’s Man of Steel despite some of his criticism about how it portrayed the hero, citing a lack of empathy as an issue.
Gunn has always kept up a major presence on social media and in 2016 during a live Facebook Q&A, he was asked who would win in a fight between Hulk and Superman. At the time, Gunn was very much believed to be one of the architects of the future of Marvel Studios, making his response a bit surprising.
Hulk vs Superman, who wins? Probably Superman, right?“He’s much more powerful than Hulk.
James Gunn via Radio Times
In 2017, after congratulating Zachary Levi for landing the lead role in Shazam!, Gunn was besieged on social media by fans for even mentioning a DC property. His response was pretty epic as he urged fans to drop the “Marvel vs. DC” mentality.
Every time I mention anything DC, no matter what, my feed becomes an endless screaming match about BvS. You guys are never going to convince each other – it’s just a bunch of wasted energy. At least when you’re screaming at each other about Trump, it’s something of international importance. But it’s a 2 year old movie that some people like and some people don’t. Why is someone else’s opinion so important to you? As Marvel and DC super fans you have way more in common with each other than you do with the rest of the world. So why do you spend so much time raging at each other? It’s silly. Please just stop it. Stop engaging in that way.
James Gunn
Less than a year later, Gunn had been fired from Marvel and hired by the old guard at DC to direct The Suicide Squad. Interestingly enough, before moving forward on The SuicideSquad, Gunn had his pick of projects including a Superman film that he turned down. Gunn also indicated that while he ultimately chose not to direct it, he briefly considered a project centered around Superman’s dog, Krypto. Though he passed on the Superman project, Gunn later revealed that he nearly ended up including the character in The Suicide Squad…as the bad guy until he settled on Starro.
I thought that was a very interesting story. But when I came up with Starro…he’s a character I loved from the comics. I think he’s a perfect comic book character because he’s absolutely ludicrous, but he’s also very scary in his own way … He used to scare the crap out of me when I was a child, putting those facehuggers on Superman and Batman and stuff. So, I thought he was one of the major DC villains that was probably never gonna be put into another movie. And if they did, they would do it like the ‘black cloud’ version of Starro — not a giant, walking starfish that’s a kaiju, that is bright-pink and cerulean blue. Just a ridiculously bright bad guy.
James Gunn via Script Apart Podcast
It’s safe to say that Superman, and the state of DC’s films, has been on Gunn’s mind for some time now. In that sense, it’s no surprise that he’s decided to make the character a priority in his early days as the co-chair after seeing him mostly sidelined by the previous regime. It looks like Gunn is going all in on that character as one of the building blocks of the DC Universe and given his love for the character, fans should look for a return to the character’s roots as a symbol of pure goodness and hope.
Expectations were high for Avatar: The Way of Water to leave the box office’s 2022 record holder in the dust. Yet, it seems that the film has surprisingly lost some momentum over the weekend and fell short of its initial $175M+ opening weekend. The reports are in and the film stands at $134M domestic opening, which is $60M higher than the previous entry, the 6th highest opening ever for a December release and ties with The Batman earlier this year.
Globally, the film managed to pull in a great $435M and if the film keeps the legs that most of James Cameron‘s films have, it ‘s got a good hold for the coming weeks, especially with how the film has no real competition in the coming weeks. Top Gun Maverick also had a lower opening weekend but managed to pull in $1.5B in its entire run but expectations are also high that Avatar: The Way of Water needs to make at least $2B to even be considered profitable.
It should also be noted that the World Cub’s final game played this weekend alongside a big NFL game, which could also be one of the influencing factors on why the box office isn’t as high as one would’ve initially expected. It’s one thing that is often forgotten when discussing box office numbers, especially information that is lost years later that give a film a massive boost. Marvel Studios’s films have a stronger opening so no one gets spoiled, which isn’t a worry with Avatar: The Way of Water.
Still, it’s surprising to see the film underperform by around $40M considering just how big of a project it is. Avatar had a lot of excitement surrounding it and it falling even lower than the initially low point of $150M might have some scratching their head. The pandemic has made predictions quite difficult and it’s another project that ended up struggling to meet its expectations at the box office this year. Even Marvel Studios’ frontloaded films had some decent holds after a massive second weekend drop, which might be more reflective of current box office developments.
For now, the second weekend will be its big test. Even if it fell short of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, it’ll need a strong hold to ensure it doesn’t lose momentum. It’s still curious to think that its CinemaScore stands at an A rather than the A+ of Top Gun Maverick, which might hint at its legs being strong but not as strong as they could’ve been. With Marvel movies having decent runs with B scorings, it’s not as simple as it might seem at times.
The newly-formed DC Studios has continued to cause pure chaos and make the DC Entertainment brand messier than ever—which is hard to do. But perhaps better days are on the horizon for the studio, as co-CEO James Gunn told Twitter this week that DC Studios has a new slate set, and he plans to unveil the first part of it in early 2023. With that announcement, though, came the news that Superman actor Henry Cavill will in fact not be returning to play the character in the future. Cavill announced his return in October with his post-credits scene cameo in Black Adam to much fanfare. Black Adam, for a few reasons now, has become a fairly awkward moment in DC’s history. It probably does not help that Dwayne Johnson’s team reportedly leaked the film’s profit report based on false assumptions to try and prove to the public that the movie was profitable.
With everything happening at DC Studios, it begs the questions of whether the four remaining DCEU films with scheduled releases will actually happen, or alternatively, matter. If The Flash does go forward, it apparently cut Cavill’s and Gal Gadot’s cameos in its most recent cut, which would suggest that DC’s flagship characters across the board will likely get recast in a hard reboot situation. In that reboot scenario, it is very unclear how films like Blue Beetle will play any role in the studio’s grand new plan, but you can read the first official synopsis of the film here. It could be all we get.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
This website uses cookies
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
Name
Description
Duration
Cookie Preferences
This cookie is used to store the user's cookie consent preferences.
30 days
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
Name
Description
Duration
comment_author_email
Used to track the user across multiple sessions.
Session
comment_author_url
Used to track the user across multiple sessions.
Session
comment_author
Used to track the user across multiple sessions.
Session
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
Pinterest Tag is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.